-
It will be built on ,bootle will pass it. Damian Moore don't give a monkeys. Just getting more free publicity. What steps in writing worth any weight is he entering forward ? Where's Dawson and Barton view on this. They know it's a done deal? So you won't see them getting any photos taken. It's a done deal.They already have the first tick in the box getting done with the asbestos removers. They been there 4 weeks. Just saying. Hope know body minds. 😳🙄🤔😷😭😭😭
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
Your Comments:
-
1) The developer will need to carry out a flood risk assessment and satisfy statutory consultees (if they haven't already done one) not local amateur "experts".
2) Damien seems to be saying the Phillips site was green belt.
3) The schools aren't projected to be full taking into account future demographics
4) How does Damien expect the Tories to build all the houses they're promising without some of them being built on fields? Not bandwagon jumping, surely?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
gazaprop
We need more housing and this plan seems ideal - a mix of brownfield and greenbelt sites being used. All the objections can be addressed by simple engineering and building projects.
Schools are at capacity all over Southport yet sites at Kew, the old infirmary, Liverpool Road by St Thomas Moores and Kensington Road are all either ongoing, completed or near completion and, as far as I'm aware, the world's still turning. One site is immediately adjacent to this proposal and I don't recall a big hoo ha being raised over that.
My suspicion here is someone has whispered the words affordable housing or worse still for the NIMBY - social housing - AAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGGH
Just 32 out of 300 will be affordable homes.
Dont kid yourself, this is about a few people making a shed load of money!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes