|
-
Why did .............
Why did men wear a flat cap on their heads on Sundays - from the 15th century up until almost the eighteenth century?
During the middle ages, several men opted not to grow a beard - why?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Why did.....
you take it up yourself to more or less monopolise the forum?
Age is simply a matter of mind - age doesn't matter if you don't mind
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
I believe it was part of the Sumptuary Laws passed by Queen Elizabeth 1. It was a form of job creation scheme as well as fashion but the sumptuary Laws were rarely enforced. It was also another way to keep the Peasants in their place.
"Elizabethan Sumptuary Statutes. Sumptuary laws were enacted in many centuries and countries. In Elizabethan England, these laws attempted to restrict the sumptuousness of dress in order to curb extravagance, protect fortunes, and make clear the necessary and appropriate distinctions between levels of society."
The first Sumptuary Laws were dated 15 June 1574,16 years of Elizabeth 1st
As for beards, they were considered to be out of fashion and the sign of a Barbarian but like all fashions, attitudes change.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants, they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
Image changed due to narcissistic meglomania
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Why did men wear a flat cap on their heads on Sundays - from the 15th century up until almost the eighteenth century?
During the middle ages, several men opted not to grow a beard - why?
By Law.
In 1571, Parliament decreed that all non-noblemen and boys over the age of six must cover their heads with wool caps on Sundays and holidays. Anyone found walking about without a wool cap on Sunday would be slapped with a three farthing fine. The law was established to generate domestic wool sales, which were the bedrock of the English economy at the time.
The law was repealed after 26 years, but by then people already liked the look and feel of their wool caps and kept right on wearing them. For centuries afterwards, the flat cap would be linked with working men and tradesmen in England and Ireland. At the turn of the century, immigrants brought the hat to the United States where it gained popularity among young boys. Today, the style is warmly embraced around the world and by every strata of society.
Beards were taxed?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
It was also expected that Christian Men & Women would cover their hair anyway from the earliest Christian times!
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants, they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
Image changed due to narcissistic meglomania
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Hamble
Beards were taxed?
SSSSSHHHHHHH! Don't give your lot ideas they'll soon be taxing beards AND razors.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Little Londoner
SSSSSHHHHHHH! Don't give your lot ideas they'll soon be taxing beards AND razors.
I did read somewere that there was even a consideration that meat and dairy should also be taxed due to the amount ofmethane from rummins harming the ozone layer,with the gaseous outpourings.that also brings into the argument the consumption of legumes by humans,garlic and onions too! oh an curry ,chilli foods too .but then again they do come out hotter than when taken in so suppose those are at your own risk.ring sting haha!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Derek H
Why did.....
you take it up yourself to more or less monopolise the forum?
No-one can do that - if you have any topics to keep site lively and interesting - be everyone's guest and put them on the site.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by rolling-thunder
It was also expected that Christian Men & Women would cover their hair anyway from the earliest Christian times!
That is interesting - I thought that was for the Catholic people.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Hamble
By Law.
In 1571, Parliament decreed that all non-noblemen and boys over the age of six must cover their heads with wool caps on Sundays and holidays. Anyone found walking about without a wool cap on Sunday would be slapped with a three farthing fine. The law was established to generate domestic wool sales, which were the bedrock of the English economy at the time.
The law was repealed after 26 years, but by then people already liked the look and feel of their wool caps and kept right on wearing them. For centuries afterwards, the flat cap would be linked with working men and tradesmen in England and Ireland. At the turn of the century, immigrants brought the hat to the United States where it gained popularity among young boys. Today, the style is warmly embraced around the world and by every strata of society.
Beards were taxed?
Absolutely! When you look back at strange traditions in history - it makes you wonder what may come up in the future.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by jamyramy
I did read somewere that there was even a consideration that meat and dairy should also be taxed due to the amount ofmethane from rummins harming the ozone layer,with the gaseous outpourings.that also brings into the argument the consumption of legumes by humans,garlic and onions too! oh an curry ,chilli foods too .but then again they do come out hotter than when taken in so suppose those are at your own risk.ring sting haha!
Ha!Ha! Surely there is enough taxes already - I mean way back in history they had not considered Global warming taxes, Ozone Layer taxes and VAT.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Ha!Ha! Surely there is enough taxes already - I mean way back in history they had not considered Global warming taxes, Ozone Layer taxes and VAT.
never really understood value added tax,or purchase tax(showing my age there) its like you've paid tax on your earnings then,oh goody be gratfull you can spend whats left on keeping the economy going and jobs alive,by spending it on whats made the effort a little bit rewarding,for getting out of bed and earning.so well have a bit of that too!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by jamyramy
never really understood value added tax,or purchase tax(showing my age there) its like you've paid tax on your earnings then,oh goody be gratfull you can spend whats left on keeping the economy going and jobs alive,by spending it on whats made the effort a little bit rewarding,for getting out of bed and earning.so well have a bit of that too!
Yeah! That sounds about right! Damn good job we don't have to fund Royalty to go to the Crusades now.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Yeah! That sounds about right! Damn good job we don't have to fund Royalty to go to the Crusades now.
ah now don't mention the crusades,there but in another life spent.haha.lookin forward to the next.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
That is interesting - I thought that was for the Catholic people.
Until Henry the 8th there wasn't really much of a difference. Hat's stopped peoples heads getting burnt so it was a pragmatic rule.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants, they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
Image changed due to narcissistic meglomania
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
|
Search Qlocal (powered by google)
Privacy & Cookie Policy
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Also website at southportnews.co.uk
Qlocal Supports Woodlands Animal Sanctuary
Booking.com
Supporting Local Business
Be Seen - Advertise on Qlocal
UK, Local Online News Community, Forums, Chats, For Sale, Classified, Offers, Vouchers, Events, Motors Sale, Property For Sale Rent, Jobs, Hotels, Taxi, Restaurants, Pubs, Clubs, Pictures, Sports, Charities, Lost Found
southport,
southport News,
|