-
Originally Posted by
Alikado
Labour
You are saying Labour would pick up more votes if they were more anti-Semitic?
I disagree- neither The Labour Party or Corbyn is anti Semitic.
The problem is covert anti Semitism.Infiltration of far left fascism far more attractive to voters so inclined.
Will covert far left anti Semitism engender more votes to carry the Labour Party to power in the UK?
During the last but one General Election (just after a wave of anti Semitism in the UK during Labour political demonstrations )the Jewish press had a discussion on whether to keep (far left fascist Labour) out of power Jewish voters should vote tactically en bloc for UKIP.
The moral stance won the idea was abandoned not least due to the Jewish figures would have no impact on numbers.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Originally Posted by
darkside
typo in the thread title? Surely there's an 'l' needing to be replaced with an 'n'.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
Little Londoner
Seems that Countries that have Abandoned Austerity are prospering but the Old Etonian Tories are not Learning they think it keeps the plebs in their place.
It is a funny situation that they are incapable of grasping (some school Eton is eh?) that pay rises = Tax revenue increases, more spending = VAT income rising. But all they are interested in is keeping the MANY DOWN to KEEP THE FEW on their pedestal. Horrible Vindictive bunch of hypocrites.
Ruddy Socialists!
Quote
"An Observer investigation into a little-known government allowance reveals that last year more than £100 million of taxpayers' money - enough to build five new inner-city schools - was spent paying for children of diplomatic staff and military officers to be educated at some of Britain's top school.
Over the past year, Eton, Sevenoaks, Fettes in Edinburgh and King's School in Canterbury have raked in hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money to educate the children of diplomats and spies.
The government has maintained the controversial subsidy despite scrapping the assisted places scheme which was aimed at helping children from poorer backgrounds to attend private school. The £140m a year saved was used to fund class-size cuts.
Last year, the Treasury spent more than £17m on the private school fees of Foreign Office staff, some of whom earn £100,000 a year and are living in Britain. In addition the MoD, which operates a similar scheme for its officers, paid out more than £85m to privately educate more than 8,000 pupils.
The Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, is known to have serious misgivings about the scheme, which has seen more than £350m being spent on privately educating the sons and daughters of officers in the past five years.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics.../23/uk.schools
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes